Climate Variability and
Change in the Southwest
Part II: Symposium
September 3,
1997
Chapter 5
Southwest Regional Overview
Diana M. Liverman, Director
Latin American Area Center and
Associate Professor of Geography
The University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ
Environmental Stresses and
Social Concerns in the Southwest
Certain social
and economic trends and environmental conditions make the Southwest
especially vulnerable to climate change:
- The region is
experiencing rapid population and economic growth, with tourism, development,
retail, and other service sectors now making up much of the regional
economy.
- An assured water
supply is essential for municipal and industrial users and, to a certain
extent, for irrigated agriculture and natural ecosystems (such as
riparian vegetation and wildlife).
- The ranching,
non-irrigated agriculture, and forestry sectors are dependent on the
amount of soil moisture and the timing of rainfall.
- The restructuring
of agriculture, due in part to global economic forces, is shifting
the types of crops grown. In many cases, the new crop mix is much
more water intensive. In other areas, agricultural land is being converted
into urban developments.
- Intense differences
in values and political conflicts exist over the use of land and water
in the region, with disputes arising over local-versus federal-land
ownership and control, resource use versus conservation and protection,
and urban lifestyles versus rural livelihoods.
- Unresolved water
rights for Native American tribes and binational treaty obligations
with Mexico pose unique institutional challenges or uncertainties
in the region to manage water and other natural resources.
- Differences
in income and access to other financial or institutional resources
make some segments of the society in region more vulnerable than are
others to climate variations and change.
The rest of the
chapter provides a socioeconomic profile of the Southwest and shows
how each of these activities is affected by or vulnerable to climate
change.
Economy
The economies of
both Arizona and New Mexico are expanding relatively rapidly and are
dominated by the service, retail, and government sectors. At first glance,
these activities seem much less vulnerable to climatic variations such
as drought than sectors such as agriculture, forestry, or industrial
resource extraction.
Yet complex economic
linkages both within and outside the region are such that impacts in
one sector often affect others.
For example, heatwaves,
floods, prolonged droughts, and snowstorms may affect crops, roadways,
bridges, and other infrastructure, but also may change energy demand,
alter retail sales, or increase insurance claims or hospital admissions
in ways that affect service and retail sectors.
Key points
- The economies
of Arizona and New Mexico are growing faster than most other states.
- Services and
retailing are the largest sectors of the Southwest economy.
- More than 75
percent of employees work in sales, services, or government.
- Severe and prolonged
climate events can have a significant direct impact on key economic
sectors, as well as an indirect impact on related areas.
Lifestyle
It is important
to remember that our climate has made positive contributions to the
lifestyle and growth of the Southwest, attracting migrants and tourists,
and enabling productive agriculture. Along the way, we have adapted
to the stresses of a hot, dry climate through irrigation, air conditioning,
and housing design.
The Southwest may
provide a model for the rest of the country to adapt to global warming.
But we must not forget that our adaptations have come at a cost--in
the water transfers, energy demands, and environmental modifications
that transformed the desert--and in some cases we may be reaching the
limits of our adaptive capabilities.
Many have called
for the adoption of more long-term and sustainable strategies, such
as increasing reliance on solar energy, increasing energy efficiency,
and decreasing per capita water use.
Key points
- The warm climate
has attracted people to the Southwest and is an important draw for
corporations, retirees, and tourists.
- In some ways
the Southwest has already adapted to the warmer, drier, and more extreme
climates that could be a result of global warming.
- Adaptations
include large-scale water transfers and air conditioning, but these
can be costly in terms of federal subsidies, environmental impacts,
and individual water and energy bills.
- New, more sustainable
strategies are needed to assure a high-quality lifestyle for the current
population and future generations.
Land Use
Geographical patterns
of vulnerability to climatic variation are suggested by the overall
pattern and structure of land and water use in the Southwest.
As shown in Figure
5.1, nearly two-thirds of the land in both Arizona and New Mexico is
used for ranching, and a quarter is in forests or parks. Both of these
sectors depend on the soil moisture provided by rain and snow.
Hence, significant
climatic changes (e.g. an extended drought) potentially can have a major
impact over a large area of the Southwest. Irrigated cropland and urban
settlements, while occupying relatively small areas, are vulnerable
due to their heavy reliance on the delivery of groundwater or surface
water supplies.

Key Points
- Pasture, forests,
and parks occupy more than 90 percent of the land in Arizona and New
Mexico.
- Ecosystems and
human activities associated with these areas are particularly vulnerable
to extended droughts and may be affected significantly by ecological
changes resulting from long-term climate change.
Water Use
Though relatively
small in its land use, irrigated agriculture--as shown in Figure 5.2--is
by far the most extensive user of water in the Southwest. Municipal
use is of growing but of secondary importance.
Vulnerability to
climate is mediated by the rivers, surface reservoirs, and groundwater
aquifers that supply most of the water for the region. But many aquifers
are being mined and are only partly replenished by precipitation.
Hot, dry conditions
bring on rapid evapotranspiration from crops and surface supplies.

Key points
- Irrigated agriculture
is by far the largest user of water in the Southwest.
- Presently, water
supplies in the Southwest are about 50 percent surface water and 50
percent groundwater.
- More groundwater
is being pumped than replenished in most regions.
- Municipal water
use is increasing with rapidly growing populations and economic development.
Colorado River and Rio Grande
The Colorado River
(Figure 5.3, Plate 2) and the Rio Grande (Figure 5.4, Plate 2) have
been called the lifeblood of the Southwest. Rights to their water have
been fully allocated between nations, states, and different water users.

Figure
5.3. The Colorado River Basin (from Dettinger, 1997, on the U.S. Geological
Survey Global Change Research Program Web site at http://geochange.er.usgs.gov/sw/changes/natural/codrought)

Figure
5.4. The Rio Grande Basin (from the Rio Grande Alliance Web site at
http://www.riogrande.org/basin/basinmap.htm)
Large fluctuations
in year-to-year flows in the rivers or their tributaries (Figure 5.5,
Plate 2)--caused mainly by climatic variations--creates stresses for
water- management institutions and conflict between users.

Figure
5.5 Mean annual flow of the Colorado River in million acre feet (from
Diaz and Anderson, 1995)
Understanding variations
and potential changes in the flows of these rivers is critical for water
resources, energy and ecosystem management in our region.
Key points
- The Colorado
River and the Rio Grande systems are the most important surface water
supplies in the Southwest. Rights to the flows are fully allocated.
- Flow in these
basins varies from year to year especially in relation to snow conditions
in the upper parts of the basins. For example, in 1983, the Colorado
River's annual flow was over 22 million acre feet (MAF), while in
1954, it was just slightly more than 10 MAF.
- International
treaties divide flows with Mexico and domestic interstate compacts
allocate flow between the U.S. states. The allocations stipulated
in these agreements, particularly for the Colorado River, were based
on periods of unusually high flow. Under present climatic conditions,
the flows are inadequate to meet all potential allocations. Climate
variability and change may threaten these international and interstate
management arrangements if flows become further reduced.
Agriculture and Water
As mentioned earlier,
irrigated agriculture uses more water than any other sector, only a
portion of which is returned to the system. In hot, dry years, water
supplies are limited yet crops require more water to survive.
In Arizona, irrigators
are accumulating water credits for water rights they own but do not
use because of low crop prices. Institutional changes may mean that
farmers can sell these rights to the municipal sector and that as a
result, overall water demand may level off or even decline. This could
reduce climatic vulnerability.
Key points
- Irrigation is
necessary for most crop production in the Southwest, and agriculture
is a major water user and holder of water rights.
- Over half the
water withdrawn for irrigation is consumed through evapotranspiration
or is incorporated into crops, 17 percent is lost by evaporation from
lakes and canals or from leaks, and only 29 percent returns to streams
or groundwater.
- Climatic variations
influence water supplies. High temperatures increase crop water demands.
- Land and water
are shifting away from agricultural to urban use.
Urban Water Use
In the Southwest--where
most of the population dwells in urban areas--populations are growing
very rapidly, and municipal water use is expected to grow at least 20
percent by 2040.
Water use varies
considerably between cities as a result of urban design and individual
behavior. Figure 5.6 shows a dramatic difference in per capita water
use between, for example, Santa Fe and Las Vegas.
Urban demands also
vary seasonally due to climate and other conditions, with the greatest
demand in summer months. Could climate change limit urban development
in the Southwest?

Key points
- Urban populations
are growing rapidly in the Southwest, at rates greater than three
percent per year.
- Water use per
capita varies considerably by community.
- Water use also
varies seasonally, with peak demand in the summer months.
- Urban water
demand is increasing and is expected to grow at least 20 percent by
2040.
Water Use in Indian Country
Resources on tribal
lands have been severely affected by recent droughts. For example, the
San Carlos Apache tribe had to deal with the drying up of a major reservoir
and the resulting loss of income, such as from reduced fishing and water-recreation
fees.
Water use is increasing
on many reservations, and if water rights are settled further increases
will be possible. Several groups plan to expand irrigated agriculture
as illustrated by this data from the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
How vulnerable
will these new irrigated areas be to climatic variation ? Will the transfer
of rights increase drought impacts for other sectors?
Key points
- Agriculture,
water supplies, and health are vulnerable to climate change on tribal
lands in the Southwest.
- Settlement of
Indian water right claims (in Arizona, about 3.1 million acre-feet)
will increase overall water demand and shift drought vulnerabilities.
Climate Extremes: Floods
Variations in year-to-year
precipitation and storm severity can cause serious flooding in the Southwest,
particularly during the summer monsoons and spring snowmelt (Table 5.1).
During the summer
of 1997, several flood-related deaths and major economic losses occurred
in the region. Nationally, floods cost billions of dollars in insurance
and personal losses, and in federal, state and private emergency relief.
Insurance companies are very concerned about climate change.
Severe floods and
droughts have often affected up to 40 percent of the area of the Southwest
(see Figure 6.4 in next chapter).
FLOODS IN ARIZONA AND
NEW MEXICO
|
YEAR
|
STATE
|
AREA
AFFECTED
|
| 1862 |
AZ |
Gila
and Colorado Rivers |
| 1891 |
AZ |
Central
Highlands |
| 1904 |
NM |
N,
E, and NE parts of state |
| 1905 |
AZ |
San
Francisco - Verde Rivers |
| 1916 |
AZ |
Central
Highlands |
| 1921 |
AZ |
Phoenix
(Cave Creek) |
| 1926 |
AZ |
San
Pedro River |
| 1927 |
NM |
Animas
and San Juan Rivers |
| 1941 |
AZ |
Central |
| 1941 |
NM |
Central
(S, SW, and SE) |
| 1942 |
NM |
Rio
Grande |
| 1942 |
Brawley/Santa
Rosa Washes |
| 1965 |
NM |
N,
NE, and SE parts of state |
| 1966 |
AZ |
Verde,
Salt, & Gila Rivers |
| 1966 |
AZ |
Grand
Canyon - SW Utah |
| 1970 |
AZ |
Tonto
Cr. - Hassayampa R. |
| 1972 |
AZ |
Upper
Gila River |
| 1974 |
AZ |
Safford/Holyoke
Wash |
| 1977 |
AZ |
Central
and SE part of state |
| 1978 |
NM |
Gila
River |
| 1978 |
AZ |
Central
part of state |
| 1979 |
AZ |
SE
part of state |
| 1981 |
AZ |
Tucson
area |
| 1983 |
AZ |
Colorado
River |
| 1983 |
AZ |
Santa
Cruz/San Francisco R. |
| 1988 |
NM |
Vermejo
River |
| 1993 |
AZ |
Gila
River/SW part of state |
Table
5.1. Chronology of major and other memorable floods in Arizona and New
Mexico (from Paulson et al., 1989)
Climate Extremes: Drought
While several significant
droughts have occurred during the past century or so, we only have to
look at the summer of 1996 to see some of the impacts of drought in
the Southwest. News articles document the losses on ranches, tribal
lands, and forests as the soil and wells dried up:
-
In 1996, severe drought
devastated farms and ranches in Arizona and New Mexico.
-
The impact of drought
on tribal lands was especially serious. The San Carlos reservoir
northeast of Phoenix dropped to 25 percent of its volume.
DROUGHT
IN ARIZONA AND NEW MEXICO
|
YEAR
|
STATE
|
AREA AFFECTED
|
| 1931-41 |
NM
|
Moderate
conditions in isolated areas in SW and N mountains; severe conditions
elsewhere. |
| 1932-36 |
AZ
|
Statewide--effects
differed among basins. |
| 1942-79 |
NM
|
Moderate
conditions in NE and NW; severe conditions elsewhere. |
| 1942-64 |
AZ
|
Statewide--second
most severe in 350 years. |
| 1973-77 |
AZ
|
Statewide,
but most severe in eastern part of state. |
| 1995-96 |
NM/AZ
|
Statewide |
Table
5.2. Chronology of major and other memorable droughts in Arizona and
New Mexico (from Paulson et al., 1989)
Ranching
The recent (1995-96)
drought also highlighted the vulnerability of ranching to climatic variations.
Cattle sales increased (Figure 5.7) and several ranches went out of
business as rangelands and wells dried out and feed costs soared.

But factors other
than local climate have contributed to the problems of the ranching
sector. Global grain reserves were low, contributing to high feed prices,
and a multiyear drought in Mexico overwhelmed border markets with low-priced
stock.
Key points
- Ranching by
nature is particularly vulnerable to drought.
- In 1996, ranchers
in Arizona and New Mexico faced drought, dry wells, high feed prices
and low stock prices when they tried to sell.
- External factors
such as low global grain reserves and drought in Mexico increased
the vulnerability of the ranching sector in Arizona, New Mexico, and
other U.S. states.
- Some smaller
ranches (i.e., with fewer than 50 head) went out of business during
this time period.
Energy
Another climate-sensitive
sector is energy, with both supply and demand varying with climate.
Hydroelectric supplies are clearly the most climate sensitive. Overall
electricity demand varies with seasons and from year to year (Figure
5.8).
Extreme events
can cut power supplies, and it is important to remember that many people
cannot afford to heat or cool their homes properly.

Figure 5.8.
Tucson, Arizona, residential energy demand
Key points
- Hydroelectric
generation is very dependent on climate.
- Energy consumption
also varies seasonally and interannually according to temperatures.
- Heatwaves and
severe storms can disrupt power supplies.
- Those who cannot
afford to pay for heating and air conditioning may suffer cold and
heat stress-related illness and mortality.
Forest Fires
Another highly
sensitive sector is forestry, where droughts cause economic and ecological
damage. This too has been illustrated by severe fires and high economic
costs of losses and fire fighting in recent years.
Fire frequency
is influenced by climate variability but also by management decisions
such as fire suppression and forest-access policies.

Key points
- Droughts increase
fire potential by creating tinder-dry forests.
- Fire potential
also depends on how forests are managed.
- Extreme fire
danger ratings may close forests to users and force fire crews to
suppress fires, countering ecosystem management principles.
- The U.S. Forest
Service has allocated $36 million for fire management in 1998 in the
Southwest.
Recreation and Tourism
Recreation and
tourism are very important to the economy and to the lifestyle of the
Southwest. Many climatic factors are important, including snowfall,
river flows, irrigated landscape maintenance, and heat stress.
A variety of tourist
enterprises is affected by climate variability and could be impacted
by climate change. These include skiing, rafting, and bird watching,
Key points
- The warm climate
of the Southwest offers many recreation opportunities.
- Climate change
could affect many activities by reducing river flow for white-water
rafting and water for irrigating golf courses.
- The number of
bird species and thus bird watchers could decline if habitats are
altered.
- Changing snowfall
patterns would affect the ski industry.
These are just
some of the ways in which climate affects society and economy in the
Southwest. The climate sensitivities and impacts provide an important
reason for trying to understand better what is happening to our climate
and for finding ways to better use climate information in our planning
and decisions.
Sources
Dettinger, Michael
D. 1997. Coping With Severe and Sustained Drought in the Southwest.
From online USGS Web Workshop (geochange.er.usgs.gov).
Diaz, Henry F.,
and Craig A. Anderson. 1997. Precipitation Trends and Water Consumption
in the Southwestern United States. From online USGS Web Workshop (geochange.er.usgs.gov).
Paulson, R.W.,
E.B. Chase, R. S. Roberts, and D. W. Compilers. 1989. National Water
Summary 1988-89: Hydrologic Events and Floods and Droughts. U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Supply Paper 2375, 591p.
|
|